Mediation with Retired Judges: Why Most Serious Cases Settle There

How Mediation Actually Works in New York Personal Injury Cases

By Nicholas J. Rose, Esq.

The version of mediation people picture from television, two parties in a conference room, a calm mediator, everyone walking out friends, is not what happens in a real New York personal injury case. The version that does happen is closer to a structured negotiation that takes a full day, costs both sides several thousand dollars, and ends with a number that's usually below what we asked for and above what they offered. Most of my cases that don't settle directly with the insurance carrier resolve at mediation. Almost none of them go to trial. Understanding how mediation actually runs is the difference between a client who knows what to expect and a client who feels like they got railroaded.

I've been practicing personal injury law in Queens since 2003. The mediation process below is what almost every serious case in my office goes through. I'll walk you through both kinds, the in-court mediation step that happens automatically and the private mediation step that's where the real money usually moves, and end with one of my cases as an example.

The two kinds of mediation, and why the difference matters

In New York personal injury cases there are two distinct things people call "mediation." Treating them as the same is the most common mistake clients make.

In-court mediation is what happens when your case has reached the trial calendar and the assigned judge calls both sides in for a settlement conference before the trial date. It's free. It's typically a few hours. The judge is not a neutral third party, they're your trial judge, and they have an interest in the case settling so it doesn't take up trial calendar space. They'll lean on both sides. The conversation is usually pretty perfunctory.

In-court mediation is sometimes enough to settle small to mid-size cases. The number that comes out of it is usually meaningful but rarely the case's real ceiling. The defense walks out of the conference with permission from the carrier to go up some. We walk in with a demand we know we'll come down from. The conversation is structured to find a number somewhere in the middle.

Private mediation is different. It's a full day, sometimes two. Both sides agree on a private mediator, almost always a retired Supreme Court justice, an Appellate Division alum, or a senior attorney with a known reputation. The mediator is paid for; both sides typically split the daily fee, which in New York runs $5,000 to $15,000 per day. The conversation is structured, the time is committed, and the mediator's job is to push both sides toward a number that reflects the actual trial risk.

The math of when private mediation makes sense: the cost ($5,000 to $15,000 split) has to be small relative to the gap that needs to close. Private mediation makes sense when the spread between the offer and the demand is in the hundreds of thousands or seven figures and where settling that spread without going to trial saves the client three to six years. For lower-stakes cases, in-court mediation or direct negotiation usually does the same work for a fraction of the cost.

A typical private mediation day

The morning of, both sides arrive at the mediator's office or a neutral conference space, sometimes a hotel meeting room in Manhattan or Queens. Each side has its lawyer, the client (usually), and any consulting experts who are needed. The defense brings the insurance adjuster with settlement authority, sometimes the adjuster is on the phone instead of in the room, which slows the day down but is increasingly common.

The mediator opens with a joint session. Both sides present the case briefly. Some mediators run the joint session aggressively; some skip it entirely. The point is to make sure each side has heard the other's framing one time before the rest of the day happens in separate rooms.

After the joint session, the mediator separates the rooms. They walk into the defense room and, in plain language, tell them what's weak in their position. They walk into our room and tell us the same about ours. A good mediator is paid to make both sides uncomfortable enough to settle.

Numbers move in increments. The defense, working from an offer of, say, $400,000, will go to $500,000, then $700,000, then $900,000, with each move requiring the mediator to extract a concession from us. We move in the other direction. Both sides are watching the gap close. The mediator is watching whether the gap can close enough by the end of the day, and if not, whether to push for a "mediator's proposal", a single number the mediator believes both sides should accept, presented as a take-it-or-leave-it.

A good day ends with a signed settlement memorandum. A bad day ends with both sides closer than they were that morning but still apart. Some cases need a second mediation day a few weeks later. Some cases settle by phone in the days that follow.

Why the number that comes out of mediation is usually below your demand and above their offer

This is the part most clients struggle with: even if you have a strong case, the mediated settlement is rarely as high as you hoped. Several reasons.

Trial risk is real. Even in a strong case, there's no such thing as a 100% verdict. Twelve strangers in a Queens or Brooklyn courtroom decide based on their own judgment, on what your treating doctor sounds like on the stand, and on what the defense's hired expert says. Even after summary judgment on liability, damages are unpredictable. The mediator's job is to push you to discount your demand by the trial risk. The math of settlement is always: settlement value = expected verdict × probability of winning − cost and time of getting there.

Time is money on both sides. A case that settles at mediation pays the client this year. A case taken to trial pays the client (if they win) in three to five years, usually after the verdict survives appeal. Plaintiff lawyers and clients both have to discount the trial verdict by the time and uncertainty. Defense carriers don't have the same time pressure but they do have appellate risk and litigation cost, they'd rather pay a fair settlement now than take a worse verdict later.

Both sides walk out a little unhappy. That's the structure of mediation. If both sides walked out happy, the gap was bigger than it needed to be. If one side walked out happy, the other side overpaid. The skill of the lawyer is making sure the unhappy side is the side with the deeper pockets.

What "private mediation with a former judge" really means

A retired New York Supreme Court justice or Appellate Division alum sees more cases mediated in a year than most trial lawyers see in a decade. They've ruled on hundreds of motions, presided over dozens of trials, and read appellate briefs that resulted in their decisions getting affirmed or reversed. They know what a case is worth in the venue you're sitting in. They know what your judge does in similar cases. They know what defense carriers actually pay versus what they say they pay.

When a former judge looks across the table at the defense and says, in private, "this is a $1.8 million case, you're not going to win this on appeal, you should be at $1.5 by 5 PM," that statement carries weight no plaintiff's lawyer's argument can match. The defense's adjuster has been sent into the room with authority capped at, say, $1.2 million. The mediator's job, when the case warrants it, is to make the adjuster call back to the carrier and ask for more authority.

Same logic the other direction. When a former judge tells me, in private, that my $4 million demand isn't going to survive appeal even if a jury awards it, I have to take that seriously. I might disagree. But ignoring a former judge's read on appellate risk is the move of a lawyer who's about to disappoint his client.

A real example, the $2 million Brooklyn Labor Law case

A worker was unloading window guards from a truck for a Brooklyn DOE school replacement project. The guards weighed several hundred pounds each and weren't fastened down. The stack tipped. The guards fell, knocked him off the truck, and landed on top of him. Knee surgery followed. His treating physician recommended a full knee replacement, still pending.

We litigated the case as a Labor Law §240 / §241(6) claim. Both sides filed motions, ours for summary judgment on liability, theirs to dismiss the labor-law claim entirely. Both motions were denied. With both motions denied, the judge pushed to settle.

The case went through in-court mediation first. The defense had been at $150,000. After hours in front of the trial judge, the offer reached approximately $900,000. That was where the case was when it left court.

We then took the case to private mediation. Demand range: $3M-$5M. We knew we'd come down. The defense knew they'd go up. After a full day with the mediator, the case settled at $2,000,000. Both sides ended a little unhappy. The defense paid more than they wanted. We took less than what trial might have produced. The client got paid years sooner than a trial verdict would have arrived, and avoided the appellate risk that could have left him with nothing if the labor-law claim got reversed on appeal. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

The $2 million case is the cleanest example I have of how the in-court → private mediation arc works on a serious labor-law claim. The number doubled between the two mediations. The structural difference between in-court and private mediation is exactly that, the room, the time, the mediator's authority, and the seriousness of the conversation.

What this means for you

If your case settles before mediation, that's usually fine, it means the carrier evaluated the case correctly and paid without forcing you through the mediation step. Most cases settle this way.

If your case reaches mediation, expect a full day, expect to come down from your demand, expect the defense to come up from their offer, and expect the number to land somewhere in between. Plan for it. Eat lunch. Bring something to read between rounds. The day is long.

If your case is large enough to justify private mediation, the mediator's identity matters. A mediator who knows your venue, who has a reputation in your case type, and whom both sides respect is worth the daily fee.

When to talk to a personal injury lawyer

Mediation is a tool that works best when the rest of the case has been built first, discovery completed, motions filed, damages developed. If you're early in your case, the conversation is about whether the case has the bones to get to mediation in the first place.

Free consultation: 718-261-0546 | Contact form

Related reading: Why most cases settle | Why summary judgment matters | Construction Accidents and Labor Law §240 | Mediation FAQ | The $2M Brooklyn Labor Law case

---

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case turns on its specific facts. Before relying on anything here, talk to a lawyer about your situation.